Historical Note
Main Fields of Research Activities
Directorate
Scientific Council
Persons
Contacts
Department of Law
Department of Philosophy
Udmurt branch of the Institute
Cathedra of philosophy
Cathedra of foreign languages
Search by Authors
Search of Publications
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 and earlier
About
Search by Authors
Search by Articles
2024 Vol. 24
2023 Vol. 23
2022 Vol. 22
2021 Vol. 21
2020 Vol. 20
2019 Vol. 19
2018 Vol. 18
2017 Vol. 17
2016 Vol. 16
2015 Vol. 15
2014 Vol. 14
2013 Vol. 13
2012 Issue 12
2011 Issue 11
2010 Issue 10
2009 Issue 9
2008 Issue 8
2007 Issue 7
2005 Issue 6
2004 Issue 5
2003 Issue 4
2002 Issue 3
2001 Issue 2
1999 Issue 1
 
 Publications / Constitutionalization of National Minority Rights in BRICS Countries (Brazil, India and Russia)  Print Version   Site Map     Language Switch to Russain Switch to English
Год науки
Наука и университеты

Год науки
 
Search by Authors
Search of Publications
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997 and earlier

Constitutionalization of National Minority Rights in BRICS Countries (Brazil, India and Russia)

Kumar A. Rudenko V.V. Filippova N.A.
Constitutionalization of National Minority Rights in BRICS Countries (Brazil, India and Russia) // BRICS Law Journal.– 2021.– Vol. 8. No. 3.– P. 30-66. DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-30-66.
WoS  Scopus  РИНЦ  VAC list 

On the basis of comparative law, this paper analyzes the issues of national minorities in three BRICS member-states (Brazil, India and Russia), and considers the directions and trends of the constitutionalization of national minority rights in these states. The authors argue that the coordination of the interests of industrial companies, regional communities and national minorities, alongside the establishment of common standards between BRICS are vital in order to ensure the sustainable growth of the economies of its member-states. The main comparison criteria are as follows: the understanding of the term “national minority” in different jurisdictions; the delimitation of powers of federative and regional authorities; a list of national minority rights; and instruments of representation and legal protection of national minorities. In regards to Brazil, this article focuses on the impact of the historic concept of racial democracy on contemporary policy on the issues of national minorities. For India the focus is on case law of the Supreme Court on minority issues, and for Russia the focus is on the protection of indigenous “small-numbered” peoples. The authors conclude that the direction of the constitutionalization of national minority rights differs dramatically in Brazil, India and Russia. Therefore, it is necessary to provide a common understanding of the purpose of such constitutionalization, which is namely, to preserve the identity of such minorities in the process of their gradual involvement in modern economic structures and national processes.

Full text>>

Дизайн и программирование
N-Studio беременность, мода, красота, здоровье, диеты, женский журнал, здоровье детей, здоровье ребенка, красота и здоровье, жизнь и здоровье, секреты красоты, воспитание ребенка православные знакомства, православный сайт творчeства, православные рассказы и стихи рождение ребенка,пол ребенка,воспитание ребенка,ребенок дошкольного возраста, дети дошкольного возраста,грудной ребенок,обучение ребенка,родить ребенка,загадки для детей,здоровье ребенка,зачатие ребенка,второй ребенок,определение пола ребенка,будущий ребенок
© 2006-2025
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences