Warning: file_get_contents(): Filename cannot be empty in /var/www/clients/client21/web30/web/netcat/system/templating/nc_tpl_mixin_cache.class.php on line 357
Warning: file_put_contents(/var/www/ifp.uran.ru/web/netcat_template/css/2/mixins.css): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/clients/client21/web30/web/netcat/system/templating/nc_tpl_mixin_cache.class.php on line 357
Warning: chmod(): No such file or directory in /var/www/clients/client21/web30/web/netcat/system/templating/nc_tpl_mixin_cache.class.php on line 359
Warning: filemtime(): stat failed for /var/www/ifp.uran.ru/web/netcat_template/css/2/mixins.css in /var/www/clients/client21/web30/web/netcat/system/templating/nc_tpl_mixin_cache.class.php on line 360
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences / Publications / Publications / Trial of Memory: Legal Regulation as a Tool of Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia
Trial of Memory: Legal Regulation as a Tool of Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia
Golovashina O.V. Trial of Memory: Legal Regulation as a Tool of Memory Politics in Contemporary Russia // Changing Societies & Personalities.– 2024.– V. 8. No. 2.– P. 399-417. DOI: 10.15826/csp.2024.8.2.280.
The article examines how law enforcement sanctions, typically applied to real-life actions, are being transferred to online activities. Building on François Hartog's ideas, the study links memorial legislation to a new “regime of historicity,” highlighting its unique role in commemoration. By examining relevant laws and media discussions, the study follows the evolution of memorial legislation, demonstrating its importance in commemorating the Great Patriotic War in post-Soviet symbolic politics. Analysis of the amendments to Article 354.1 of Russia's Criminal Code from its original formulation in 2014 to the revisions in 2021 reveals the shifting legal landscape surrounding online commemorative practices. As virtual spaces are gaining prominence in public discourse and legal interpretations, the boundaries between online activities and real-world actions are becoming increasingly blurred. The key trends in this process include the growing reliance on virtual platforms for information dissemination, the evolving notion of publicity in legal contexts pertaining to online behavior, and the broadening enforcement of Article 354.1. This research sheds light on the intricate interplay between memory politics, virtual spaces, and legal frameworks, reflecting broader societal shifts in information consumption and expression.
*The research was carried out at the expense of the grant in the form of subsidies from the federal budget of the Russian Federation for carrying out major scientific projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (project No 23-075-67362-1-0409-000410).
